JUREX public procurement team successfully defended client interests

On 30 January, the Court of Appeal of Lithuania expressly stated as follows in its ruling in civil case No. e2A-594-790/2020:

  • A winner of a public procurement should not expect that, in the process of implementing the public procurement contract, it will be able to earn any additional revenue that is not envisaged in the contract (for instance, by selling additional services that are not envisaged in the contract).
  • A provider that wins a procurement may not obtain an illegitimate advantage over the other participants of the public procurement and receive additional benefits from a contract, which benefits the other participants of the public procurement could not have even foresee based on the procurement terms.
  • Repeat attempts to earn such additional revenue qualify as a material breach of a public procurement contract.
all insights

In order to ensure proper functioning of the website, also for statistical and marketing purposes Law firm Judickienė and Partners JUREX uses cookies.

Necessary cookies
Necessary cookies are cookies, necessary for proper functioning of the website.
Analytical cookies
Analytical cookies collect statistical information in order to optimise functioning of the website.
Marketing cookies
Marketing cookies allow third parties to submit user-tailored offers and ads.
I agree
For more information please read our Privacy Policy.