Our experience

Our experience

Filter according to the person
Clear the filter
Kęstutis Žičkus
Jurgita Judickienė
Karolina Laurynaitė
Marius Tamošiūnas
Loreta Selilionė
Jelena Cvirko
2019 A dispute concerning compensation for damages involving a general contractor, the successor of its right of claim, a subcontractor and a designer ends with a judgment in favour of JUREX client A large-scale and fairly complex civil case, in which the court examined a dispute concerning compensation for damages resulting from failure to meet the contractual deadline involving a general contractor, the successor of its right of claim, a subcontractor and a designer, has been completed. In the framework of the case, JUREX represented the claimant, i.e. the company that had overtaken the general contractor’s right to claim compensation for damages. The court of appeal, which modified the judgment of the court of first instance, awarded to the client of JUREX compensation for damages of EUR 237,605.09 and an interest of EUR 12.688.11 on the damages from the subcontractor and compensation for damages of EUR 100,000 from the designer.
Team of experts
Kęstutis Žičkus
2019 JUREX successfully defended client interests in a case regarding reduction of the price of works JUREX has won a complex civil case, in which the dispute that had arisen out of a construction contract was settled. The court of appeal upheld the judgment of the court of first instance, by which the court satisfied the customer’s claim and reduced the price of the construction contract concluded by the parties by EUR 303,790.63, recognized that the customer’s obligation to pay the contractor EUR 74,344.74 withheld under the contract following reduction of the price of the contract had expired, included the customer on the list of creditors of the contractor in the bankruptcy case, approved the customer’s financial claim of EUR 229,445.89 and dismissed the counterclaim filed by the contractor.

Team of experts
Kęstutis Žičkus
2018 Amicable settlement between a general contractor and a subcontractor JUREX represented a cogeneration plant supplier regarding a claim that the termination of a contract was unlawful as well as on related damages, debt and penalty enforcement, and a counterclaim against our client by the general contractor on invalidating an act of acceptance of completed works and reducing the amount payable under the contract. The amount of dispute was 711,254.50 euros. A settlement agreement was concluded.
Team of experts
Kęstutis Žičkus
2018 Unfair competition case won Representing a company which provides security services, we won a case against a competing company regarding unfair competition. JUREX was able to demonstrate that no law was violated when a former employee of the competitor went to work for our client.
Team of experts
Jurgita Judickienė Karolina Laurynaitė
2018 Case won regarding qualifications for a public procurement Representing a company which trades in medical supplies and devices, we won a case against Kauno Klinikos, which as a purchasing organisation in a public tender held that our client did not meet the requirements to qualify to participate in the tender. Our client was reinstated, won the tender, signed the procurement agreement, and successfully fulfilled it.
Team of experts
Jurgita Judickienė Karolina Laurynaitė
2018 Client successfully represented at The Hague District Court We successfully represented a client at the District Court of The Hague in an international case regarding complex agency relationships and acts of unfair competition. JUREX also successfully administered a EUR 3 million portfolio of problem loans. The value of the litigation at The Hague District Court was EUR 8.7 million.
Team of experts
Marius Tamošiūnas
2018 Precedent established on the liability of a tender organiser While representing a client in a case, a clarification was obtained from the Supreme Court of Lithuania to the effect that the organiser of a tender who during the tender provided rather clear expert information on certain features of the object of the tender must bear responsibility for the correctness of that information. The case was thus returned to the court of first instance for retrial. A precedent was created that the organiser of a tender is liable for the correctness of the tender terms and the information provided to participants during the tender.
Team of experts
Jurgita Judickienė Kęstutis Žičkus Loreta Selilionė
2018 Case won on recognition of a transaction as invalid and application of unilateral restitution The basis for this dispute was that a cargo vehicle which the plaintiff acquired from the defendant for resale later turned out to be stolen. The plaintiff resold the vehicle to a third party (a citizen of the Russian Federation), and that person’s attempt to bring the vehicle into Russia revealed an Interpol search for it as stolen. The vehicle was immediately confiscated. The court of first instance satisfied 99% of the plaintiff’s claim.
Team of experts
Jurgita Judickienė Marius Tamošiūnas Jelena Cvirko
Lietuvių
English

In order to ensure proper functioning of the website, also for statistical and marketing purposes Law firm Judickienė and Partners JUREX uses cookies.

Necessary cookies
Necessary cookies are cookies, necessary for proper functioning of the website.
Analytical cookies
Analytical cookies collect statistical information in order to optimise functioning of the website.
Marketing cookies
Marketing cookies allow third parties to submit user-tailored offers and ads.
I agree
For more information please read our Privacy Policy.
Find out more

Subscribe our newsletter

E-mail *
Pateikdama(s) savo elektroninio pašto adresą sutinkate, kad Advokatų profesinė bendrija Judickienė ir partneriai JUREX jį tvarkys tiesioginės rinkodaros tikslu. Savo sutikimą bet kada galėsite atšaukti, pateikdami prašymą el. paštu info@jurex.lt. Daugiau informacijos Privacy Policy.