Our experience

Our experience

Filter according to the person
Clear the filter
Kęstutis Žičkus
Jurgita Judickienė
Karolina Laurynaitė
Marius Tamošiūnas
Loreta Selilionė
Jelena Cvirko
2018 Amicable settlement between a general contractor and a subcontractor JUREX represented a cogeneration plant supplier regarding a claim that the termination of a contract was unlawful as well as on related damages, debt and penalty enforcement, and a counterclaim against our client by the general contractor on invalidating an act of acceptance of completed works and reducing the amount payable under the contract. The amount of dispute was 711,254.50 euros. A settlement agreement was concluded.
Team of experts
Kęstutis Žičkus
2018 Unfair competition case won Representing a company which provides security services, we won a case against a competing company regarding unfair competition. JUREX was able to demonstrate that no law was violated when a former employee of the competitor went to work for our client.
Team of experts
Jurgita Judickienė Karolina Laurynaitė
2018 Case won regarding qualifications for a public procurement Representing a company which trades in medical supplies and devices, we won a case against Kauno Klinikos, which as a purchasing organisation in a public tender held that our client did not meet the requirements to qualify to participate in the tender. Our client was reinstated, won the tender, signed the procurement agreement, and successfully fulfilled it.
Team of experts
Jurgita Judickienė Karolina Laurynaitė
2018 Client successfully represented at The Hague District Court We successfully represented a client at the District Court of The Hague in an international case regarding complex agency relationships and acts of unfair competition. JUREX also successfully administered a EUR 3 million portfolio of problem loans. The value of the litigation at The Hague District Court was EUR 8.7 million.
Team of experts
Marius Tamošiūnas
2018 Precedent established on the liability of a tender organiser While representing a client in a case, a clarification was obtained from the Supreme Court of Lithuania to the effect that the organiser of a tender who during the tender provided rather clear expert information on certain features of the object of the tender must bear responsibility for the correctness of that information. The case was thus returned to the court of first instance for retrial. A precedent was created that the organiser of a tender is liable for the correctness of the tender terms and the information provided to participants during the tender.
Team of experts
Jurgita Judickienė Kęstutis Žičkus Loreta Selilionė
2018 Case won on recognition of a transaction as invalid and application of unilateral restitution The basis for this dispute was that a cargo vehicle which the plaintiff acquired from the defendant for resale later turned out to be stolen. The plaintiff resold the vehicle to a third party (a citizen of the Russian Federation), and that person’s attempt to bring the vehicle into Russia revealed an Interpol search for it as stolen. The vehicle was immediately confiscated. The court of first instance satisfied 99% of the plaintiff’s claim.
Team of experts
Jurgita Judickienė Marius Tamošiūnas Jelena Cvirko
Find out more

Subscribe our newsletter

E-mail *
Pateikdama(s) savo elektroninio pašto adresą sutinkate, kad Advokatų profesinė bendrija Judickienė ir partneriai JUREX, kodas 3005573017, T. Kosciuškos 24, Vilnius, jį tvarkys tiesioginės rinkodaros tikslu.